Twenty-year-old Jake Freeman bet US$27 million in Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. and sold his stake just weeks later
Author of the article:
Financial Times
Patrick Jenkins
Shopping carts stand lined up in front of a Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. store in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Photo by Luke Sharrett/Bloomberg files When news emerged recently of the 20-year-old student who had made US$110 million buying and selling shares in a tired homeware brand, there was an understandable uproar. The Financial Times revealed Jake Freeman had invested US$27 million in Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. in July, selling it only a few weeks later for nearly five times as much.
Advertisement 2 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Social media exploded with snide commentary, most of it focused on how entitled Freeman was to have US$27 million at his disposal in the first place. (Family and friends helped fund the trade, Freeman told the FT.) A few sniped, too, that the return was “not that impressive.” (Really?)
Financial Post Top Stories Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the Financial Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.
By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Postmedia Network Inc. | 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4 | 416-383-2300
Among the tide of Twitter criticism, though, no one thought to make the obvious critique: Freeman bet his whole US$27 million on one historically volatile stock. BB&B has gyrated between US$4 and US$28 over the past year, often moving wildly with no other impetus than social media hype.
In doing so, he junked the old-school investment principle that no matter what your timeframe, a good investor will traditionally choose a broad balance of equities, bonds and other ideally non-correlated assets. In short, a good investor diversifies risk.
Advertisement 3 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Or to quote Nobel laureate Harry Markowitz, who in 1952 coined the “modern portfolio theory” concept, “in choosing a portfolio, investors should seek broad diversification” and be “willing to ride out the bad as well as the good times.”
Markowitz could not have known quite how influential his thinking would prove. Among other things, he helped turbocharge a previously modest mutual-fund industry. By the end of last year, according to data provider Statista, US$27 trillion was invested in mutual funds in the United States alone, with a further US$7 trillion in exchange-traded funds.
Over the past decade, according to mutual fund giant Vanguard Group Inc., you could have earned an annual 13.8 per cent tracking the S&P 500. That is impressive by most measures, but it is a long way from Freeman’s 400 per cent in a month.
Advertisement 4 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Though the scale and speed of the student’s spoils attracted particular attention, he is really just a poster boy for the meme-stock generation of investors, who have spent the past couple of years looking for big quick wins from buying and selling undervalued stocks or hyping and dumping crypto coins, often with borrowed money. (Some have succeeded, others have failed, occasionally with tragic consequences.)
The grounds for criticism are obvious: this is gambling, not investing; crypto is a Ponzi scheme; the scope for financial misery is vast.
Yet among the valid skepticism, there is a kernel of validity in what Freeman has spotlighted. Though he hails from a moneyed background, his is a generation that has felt deprived of the asset appreciation enjoyed by their parents and grandparents. The resentment will have been sharpened by cost-of-living increases unseen for nearly half a century.
Advertisement 5 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
For many, the hunt for high-risk, high-return gains may feel like an imperative, all the more so given the generally lacklustre returns in markets as a whole, and a daunting macro outlook, both economically and geopolitically. So far this year, the S&P 500 has lost about 14 per cent.
More On This Topic Wall Street investors expect meme stock mania to stick around As tech valuations fall, companies rethink stock options Noah Solomon: Market uncertainty leads to investor passivity at the wrong times Some of the world’s wiliest investors might agree — at least up to a point. Equity long-short hedge funds typically have very concentrated portfolios. Warren Buffett (who famously called diversification “protection against ignorance”) now has three-quarters of his equity investments in five companies (Apple Inc., Bank of America Corp., Chevron Corp., Coca-Cola Co. and American Express Co).
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content In the United Kingdom, Baillie Gifford’s Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust has prospered largely thanks to outsized bets on tech stocks such as Tesla Inc. (though predictably it has suffered this year).
There is academic research to support high-concentration investment. An influential 2006 paper led by Klaas Baks at Goizueta Business School found “a positive relation between mutual fund performance and managers’ willingness to take big bets in a relatively small number of stocks.” Outperformance amounted to as much as four per cent a year, he said.
This is not to dismiss the idea of diversification, said James Anderson, who recently stepped down after a strong record at Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust; rather stockpickers should concentrate on a small number of “conviction” holdings, and an end investor should select a range of stockpickers.
But Anderson stresses that even big conviction investors are a long way from Freeman on the metric that arguably makes the biggest difference between punting and investing: timeframe. A month is too short? “Even a 12-month horizon is very difficult,” he said. “You have to invest for the really long term: at least 10 years, preferably forever.”
The Financial Times Ltd.
_____________________________________________________________
If you like this story, sign up for the FP Investor Newsletter.
_____________________________________________________________