‘Conventional portfolios are in big trouble’
Author of the article:
Financial Times
Harriet Agnew and Chris Flood in London
A trader works on the trading floor at the New York Stock Exchange. Photo by REUTERS/Andrew Kelly files Fund managers have been tripped up by global stocks and bonds falling in tandem in the first quarter.
Advertisement 2 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
The FTSE All World stocks index, including dividends, dropped 5.1 per cent in the first three months of the year, reflecting rising benchmark interest rates and the outbreak of war in Ukraine.
At the same time, soaring inflation and tighter monetary policy took a six per cent bite from the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond index, leaving those shying away from stocks without a reliable bolt hole.
The two key markets underpinning global finance are seldom correlated and such moves tend to be rare and brief. This year’s quarterly slump — the worst synchronized decline since both benchmarks have been available — is enduring enough to leave investors questioning how to balance risks in their portfolios.
“The first quarter was challenging,” said Seth Bernstein, chief executive of US$779-billion asset manager AllianceBernstein Holding LP. “There was nowhere to hide for investors.”
Advertisement 3 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
For years, a 60/40 balanced approach has been the mainstay of investment portfolios, where investors allocate 60 per cent to equities, for capital appreciation, and 40 per cent to bonds, to potentially offer income and risk mitigation. This worked well over the past decades as equities surged in a near-straight line to record highs and interest rates fell to new lows, firing up bond prices. But this model now faces some serious strain.
“Conventional portfolios are in big trouble,” said Duncan MacInnes, an investment director at 25.3-billion-pound wealth manager Ruffer LLP. “Cross-asset correlations are much higher than they were and there is an illusion of diversification across the industry. Everyone is doing worse than they thought they would.”
Advertisement 4 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
The classic 60/40 portfolio generated an 11.1 per cent annual return from 2011 to 2021, according to Goldman Sachs Asset Management LP, or 9.1 per cent a year adjusting for inflation. But fund managers warned that these kinds of returns from a balanced portfolio do not look sustainable over the next decade.
Stocks are near all-time highs, valuations are stretched and United States equities are increasingly concentrated in the six biggest technology names — the so-called FAANGM companies: Facebook Inc., Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Netflix Inc., Google LLC and Microsoft Corp. Meanwhile, bonds are up against the challenges of ultra-low yields, inflation and the prospect of a cycle of rising interest rates.
Advertisement 5 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Michael Hartnett, chief investment strategist at Bank of America Corp., said rising inflation rates meant a third “great bear” market for U.S. bonds was now under way. BofA is warning that long-term bond yields will rise above four per cent during 2024 and increases in interest rates by the U.S. Federal Reserve in response to higher inflation are also likely to drag down U.S. stocks. BofA predicts the S&P 500 will fall below 4,000 this year, a drop of more than 15 per cent from its December peak.
The war in Ukraine has heightened these pressures by pushing inflation still higher and compromising the growth outlook.
“From a purely economic point of view, Russia/Ukraine has exacerbated what was already an incredibly difficult position for policymakers,” Ruffer’s MacInnes said. “It has made a very difficult situation worse and exacerbated inflation because it called for more defence stimulus and acted as a brake on commodity supply.”
Advertisement 6 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
In this environment, fund managers are advising clients to diversify their investment portfolios and temper their return expectations.
Vanguard Group Inc.’s LifeStrategy Moderate Growth fund, which allocates 60 per cent of its assets to global equities and 40 per cent to bonds, has delivered a total return, after fees, of 9.1 per cent over the decade to December 2021. Vanguard has now cautioned that returns over the next decade for a 60/40 balanced portfolio are expected to be half that, even before inflation is taken into account.
More On This Topic A handful of spring cleaning tips for your investment portfolio David Rosenberg: How investors can navigate the global water crisis Five key takeaways from Jamie Dimon’s letter to JPMorgan’s investors This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content “A core problem for investors is that 60/40 doesn’t look like it has much return potential,” said Peter Van Dooijeweert, head of multi asset solutions at US$148.6-billion asset manager Man Group, adding that this builds a case for diversifying into currencies, commodities and so-called real assets such as infrastructure and real estate.
However, he cautioned that “it’s easy to say that you need to diversify, but it’s not that easy to implement, especially as asset classes like commodities have had monster moves up and no one has forgotten crude was at negative prices only two years ago.”
Invesco Ltd. recommends a 50/30/20 portfolio, split between equities, bonds and alternatives. “This is the year that is reminding investors of the importance of diversification,” said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco. “You can’t exist for the long term on just equities and bonds. And you need to be diversified not just across asset classes but within asset classes.”
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content As investors get to grips with the fact that the 60/40 strategy that has served them well for decades may now be broken, some are relieved that equities and bonds were only down five or so per cent in the first quarter.
“If you look at everything that was thrown at markets in the first quarter, this feels like an OK outcome,” Man Group’s Van Dooijeweert said. “You had a major war, a huge commodities shock, a very hawkish shift in central bank policy, China markets collapsed and then rebounded, and the nickel market closed. With all of that noise in the markets I don’t think we’re doing that badly. It could be a whole lot worse.”
The Financial Times Ltd.
_____________________________________________________________
For more stories like this one, sign up for the FP Investor newsletter.
______________________________________________________________
Financial Post Top Stories Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the Financial Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.
By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Postmedia Network Inc. | 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4 | 416-383-2300