Jamie Dimon’s S&P 500 bear market: Brutal, but far from unimaginable

jamie-dimon’s-s&p-500-bear-market:-brutal,-but-far-from-unimaginable

Don’t be surprised if the S&P 500 loses another one-fifth of its value

Author of the article:

Bloomberg News

Lu Wang and Peyton Forte

JPMorgan Chase and Co. chief executive Jamie Dimon. Photo by Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters files Jamie Dimon says don’t be surprised if the S&P 500 loses another one-fifth of its value. While such a plunge would fray trader nerves and stress retirement accounts, history shows it wouldn’t require any major departures from past precedents to occur.

Advertisement 2 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Judged by valuation and its impact on long-term returns, the JPMorgan Chase & Co. chief executive’s “easy 20-per-cent” tumble would result in a bear market that is in many regards normal. A decline roughly to 2,900 on the S&P 500 would leave the gauge 39 per cent below its January high, a notable collapse but one that pales next to both the dot-com crash and global financial crisis.

FP Investor By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Postmedia Network Inc. | 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4 | 416-383-2300

The price implied in Dimon’s scenario is roughly the index’s peak from 2018, the year when former president Donald Trump’s corporate tax cuts took effect and an equity selloff forced the United States Federal Reserve to end rate hikes.

Rolling back the gains since then would leave investors with nothing over four years, a relatively long fallow period. But given the force of the bull market that raged before then, it would cut annualized gains over the past decade only to about seven per cent, in line with the long-term average.

Advertisement 3 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Nobody knows where the market is going, Dimon included, and much will depend on the evolution of the Fed’s policy and whether earnings stand up to its anti-inflationary measures. As an exercise, though, it’s worth noticing that a drawdown of the scope he described isn’t unheard of, and would strike many Wall Street veterans as a justifiable reckoning in a market that had been carried aloft by the Fed’s generosity.

Falling interest rates had “been great for valuation multiples and we’re unwinding all of those,” Michael Kelly, global head of multi-asset at Pinebridge Investments LLC, said on Bloomberg TV. “We’ve had easy money for a long time and we can’t fix all of that very quickly.”

At 34 per cent, the average bear market since the Second World War has been a bit shallower, but the drops vary enough that a 40-per-cent plunge fits within the bounds of plausibility. One reason the current drawdown may have legs is valuation. In short, even after losing US$15 trillion of their value, stocks are far from being obvious bargains.

Advertisement 4 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

At the low last month, the S&P 500 was trading at 18 times earnings, a multiple that is above trough valuations seen in all previous 11 bear cycles, data compiled by Bloomberg show. In other words, should equities recover from here, this bear-market bottom will have been the most expensive since the 1950s. On the other hand, matching that median would require another 25-per-cent drop in the index.

“We had a period of a lot of liquidity. That’s different now,” said Willie Delwiche, an investment strategist at All Star Charts. “Given what bond yields are doing, I don’t think you can say a 40-per-cent peak-to-trough decline is out of the question.”

Would the S&P 500 become a bargain if a 20-per-cent drop played out? It’s debatable. While 2,900 is quite cheap relative to existing estimates for 2023 earnings — about US$238 a share, implying a P/E ratio of 12.2 — those estimates would be in serious trouble should a recession occur, as Dimon predicted.

Advertisement 5 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Adjusting forecasts for a 10-per-cent fall in profits yields an earnings multiple of 14.3, not expensive, but not a screaming bargain, either.

Underlining Dimon’s gloomy outlook is the threat of an economic contraction. From surging inflation to the Fed’s ending quantitative easing and Russia’s war in Ukraine, a number of “serious” headwinds are likely to push the US economy into a recession in six to nine months, the JPMorgan CEO told CNBC.

Dimon’s assessment on the economy and market appears more ominous than his own in-house forecasters. Michael Feroli, JPMorgan’s chief U.S. economist, expects real gross domestic product to expand every quarter through the end of 2023.

While market strategists led by Marko Kolanovic admitted their year-end targets for financial assets may not be reached until next year, the team kept their upbeat tone on corporate earnings. It had expected the S&P 500 to rally to 4,800 by December.

Advertisement 6 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Recommended from Editorial Cash may be king, but cash flow rules in times of volatility Encouraging signs for investors lie ahead despite all the doom and gloom Five reasons bad news is not always bad news for investors “Equities are proving to be an effective real asset class as their earnings are linked to inflation,” the team said in a note last week. “Unless nominal GDP growth downshifts drastically, earnings growth should remain resilient and defy expectations of a decline even in an environment of low real GDP growth.”

The clashing views underscore the reality of the post-pandemic world where Wall Street forecasts vary and efforts to predict the future have proved futile. Central bankers and investors alike misjudged the stickiness of inflation. Lately, it’s become clear that retailers and chipmakers miscalculated demand and ended up stocking too many unwanted goods.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content With the Fed engaged in the most aggressive monetary tightening in decades, no one can say with high conviction where the economy is going. That murky backdrop has led to a wide range of projections when it comes to corporate profits for next year — a 13-per-cent expansion to an eight-per-cent contraction, based on strategists tracked by Bloomberg.

Jane Edmondson, chief executive officer at EQM Capital LLC, says she’s more optimistic than Dimon, though she shares the concern over the Fed’s inability to address the supply side of the inflation issue.

“I would agree that if the Fed does not slow down on its quest to combat inflation, we could see more market pain,” she said. “While their hawkishness with interest rates may curb some demand, it does not solve the issues in the supply chain causing higher prices and inflation. In that sense, Jamie’s concerns are warranted as the cure is not appropriate for what ails us.”

_____________________________________________________________

If you liked this story, sign up for more in the FP Investor newsletter.

_____________________________________________________________


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *