The current fall in tech shares may turn out to be a blip, but a sustained shift in the market could be painful for ESG funds that have bet heavily on them
Author of the article:
Financial Times
Adrienne Klasa
ESG fund managers argue that sustainability has now become so baked into investment strategies across the board that a significant reversal is unlikely. Photo by Getty Images/iStockphoto files Environmental, social and governance-focused funds face a more uncertain outlook in 2022, as pressures mount from research costs and hits to the big growth stocks that have helped power the investments’ outperformance.
Advertisement This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
ESG inflows boomed throughout 2021, even as they slowed in pace towards the end of the year, with global sustainable fund assets doubling in the six months to September 2021 to reach US$3.9 trillion, according to data provider Morningstar.
But the breakneck expansion of the ESG sector could stall if performance starts to approach or underperform benchmarks, after years of high-flying returns driven by powerful rallies in growth stocks.
At the end of December, the top stocks held across the world’s 20 largest ESG funds, which together manage about US$340 billion in assets, were technology giants Microsoft Corp, Google’s parent company Alphabet Inc. and Apple Inc., according to Rumi Mahmood, vice-president of ESG research at MSCI Inc.
Advertisement This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Yet while tech shares have been big winners during the pandemic, they have taken a hit since the turn of the year, fuelling speculation that a more sustained rotation towards value strategies is in the offing as the United States Federal Reserve starts to withdraw COVID-19-era monetary stimulus.
“I think it’s going to be an important test for the industry. I’m not convinced that 100 per cent of people who are buying sustainable funds are doing so purely for environmental and ethical reasons. Many are in it as ‘tourists’ because these just happened to be the best performing funds,” said David McCann, equity analyst at Numis Corp. PLC.
It’s going to be an important test for the industry
David McCann
The tech-focused Nasdaq composite has had its worst start to the year in half a decade, briefly dropping into correction territory after the Fed adopted a more hawkish tone earlier this month before recovering to trade down 4.8 per cent since Jan. 1. The current fall may turn out to be a blip, but a sustained shift in the market could be painful for ESG funds that have bet heavily on them.
Advertisement This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
“Certain names are at the top: Microsoft, big tech, big health care … these have been trading high and are the names these funds are most overweight. If we rotate and rates rise, they will be all beaten up. Banks and resources could fare better, and those are generally underweighted by ESG funds,” said Tom Mills, equity research analyst at Jefferies Group LLC.
Shares in some more specialist ESG-focused companies are down since the start of the year on worries this could soon materialize. London-based Impax Asset Management Group PLC’s share price has fallen 15 per cent since the start of January, while Liontrust Asset Management PLC is down by about 14 per cent.
ESG fund managers argue that sustainability has now become so baked into investment strategies across the board that a significant reversal is unlikely. For many investors, certain energy and resource companies are now uninvestable, no matter how well their stocks do, fund managers say.
Advertisement This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
And while interest-rate rises discount shareholders’ future returns on speculative tech companies, the investing audience for some of those companies has also exploded.
“We’ve seen more and more of the broader market coming around to the idea that they need a net-zero target and, therefore, need to buy clean energy in order to fuel their growth, so the addressable market for these companies has grown very rapidly,” said Amanda O’Toole, who runs a cleantech-thematic fund at Axa Investment Managers.
Much store has been placed in the ability of cutting-edge technology to address sustainability issues. But fund managers are also looking for ESG prospects among more traditional companies.
ESG and climate investing isn’t all about highly priced concept stocks. We have climate plays in every sector of the market
Simon Webber
“ESG and climate investing isn’t all about highly priced concept stocks. We have climate plays in every sector of the market,” said Simon Webber, fund manager at Schroders PLC, who thinks companies such as homebuilder Kingfisher PLC, insurer Munich Re and carmaker Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW) will be big winners in the climate transition.
Advertisement This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
If there is a shakeout in sustainability investing’s fortunes, “there have been a lot of new entrants to the climate and ESG fund management business and we’ll find out, just like with companies, who is good at what they do,” Webber added.
Sustainable investing is also subject to mounting research costs that are expected to reach US$1.3 billion globally in 2022, straining already thin investment house margins and potentially endangering sustainable strategies if a market correction takes hold.
More On This Topic Shortage of ESG skills hurting Canada’s finance sector, study says Investors pull US$352 million from Cathie Wood’s ARK Innovation ETF Bausch + Lomb files to go public in U.S. and Canada, discloses revenue jump At the same time, the costs of running ESG strategies have ballooned as funds have launched and grown, and may eclipse overall research budgets by 2024.
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content “Ironically, European asset managers are less resilient and less sustainable than they were [at the onset of the financial crisis],” said Neil Scarth, of Frost Consulting Ltd. “One reason is that in 2008 asset owners rather than asset managers were paying that huge research bill, and that has now evolved to be a significant ESG cost that didn’t (previously) exist for many managers.”
ESG strategies have substantial overheads because of high data and specialized research costs, and the need to hire stewardship departments to engage with companies multiple times per year on sustainability targets.
“We are talking to some senior managers at investment firms who are starting to re-examine the relationship between ESG revenues and costs, in an environment where none of these additional costs are met by asset owners,” Scarth said.
The Financial Times Ltd.
_____________________________________________________________
If you liked this story, sign up for more in the FP Investor newsletter.
_____________________________________________________________
Financial Post Top Stories Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the Financial Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.
By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Postmedia Network Inc. | 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4 | 416-383-2300